Here is my first post on LANCOME. Basically Emma Watson is spineless. She has no real sense of her convictions. She sells herself out and short all for more money and fame instead of standing for something. I say that because Emma has said in interviews she's always had a strong sense of her conviction, she's not into fame and money will never be a reason why she does something. To only see the opposite occur later which could be described as very disingenuous on Emma's part is sad. Basically what it looks like to me is at any given time what Emma states is not true and is more of a statement that fits the moment or one she thinks will brighten her image instead of something she believe in.
Lancôme is yet another example of what I am talking about. Just months after this next quote she once again does something she states she does not believe in. I’ve used this quote before but now we have current quote to go with it. It just shows that Emma is selling herself out if she truly believes in this first statement.
Lancôme is yet another example of what I am talking about. Just months after this next quote she once again does something she states she does not believe in. I’ve used this quote before but now we have current quote to go with it. It just shows that Emma is selling herself out if she truly believes in this first statement.
From uk.msn.com November 18th 2010 "I can't understand this fragrance thing - why would you want to smell like somebody else? Don't you want to smell like yourself? I've always had a strong sense of self and my convictions... That's why I can't understand necessarily wanting to look or be somebody else. Why don't people want to be who they are?'
Photo on the right has lots of air brushing and photo shop
Not only in November 2010 she expressed this but in a YOUTUBE HERE from 2008
A few months passed and come Feb 2011 her name was hinted with Cosmetic and perfume company Lancome. I guess her convictions are not as strong as she says since she later did ads for Lancome perfume. She was later quoted as saying she loves Lancome even though she does not wear much make-up. Which is another fabrication on her part because we all know Emma looks much-much-much younger when she is not wearing make-up. She needs make-up to try to fit in the adult world she is desperately trying to gain ground in. She's been doing this for many years now.
Now since she has to be true to Lancome her story and belief system has changed. I know she works for them and has to say those things but where is the honor in pushing something you don't believe in? Like the very few examples I've shown above maybe the real issue she has no real honor?
From socialitelife.com May 2011 “I feel lucky to embody a fragrance I am so crazy in love with,” Watson said of the eau, which adds hints of Turkish rose and cool raspberry to the fruity-floral classic. “I didn’t really like perfumes before because I thought they were heavy, but this one is really light and playful.” Watson went on to say, “Being a Lancôme ambassadress today is an immense pleasure and a great honor. For me, Lancôme is an authentic brand. It reflects elegance, class and style.”
All Emma to me is your typical celebrity going through the motions saying the right things instead of saying what she believes. It's those "right things" coupled with her good looks and fashion sense that has made her popular. It's a image based off of shallow, materialistic and far from the truth things. She's a politician without being voted in. She is no different or unique when it comes to celebrity standards but she'll tell you different like she told Mexico seventeen magazine she's like Dory the Fish. You can say she has a right to change her mind but there is way too much, "she's changed her mind" on to be able to use that excuse. You can say she is forced to say those things but I ask you why would anyone want to be forced to say things they do not believe in? That's not having a strong sense of your conviction now is it? This all throws up red flags for me stating we have more of a charlatan then the real deal. As you can tell if you read those examples above or kept up with this blog, Emma Watson is too busy trying to be a brand instead of being a person that's an actress.
If you want to believe in that and her that is your perogrative but I perfer the genuine article over a media hyped and self created fairytale. Maybe if she cut out some of the more smug I am above all that statements to only go back on them it would not be that repugnant later. I rather have an imperfect person that's an actress then a fake brand that sells out.
WHAT IS A SELL OUT? "Selling out" refers to the perception that someone is compromising their integrity, morality, or principles in exchange for money or "success." It is commonly associated with attempts to tailor material to a mainstream audience. Selling out is often seen as gaining success at the cost of credibility.
Photo on the right has lots of air brushing and photo shop
Not only in November 2010 she expressed this but in a YOUTUBE HERE from 2008
A few months passed and come Feb 2011 her name was hinted with Cosmetic and perfume company Lancome. I guess her convictions are not as strong as she says since she later did ads for Lancome perfume. She was later quoted as saying she loves Lancome even though she does not wear much make-up. Which is another fabrication on her part because we all know Emma looks much-much-much younger when she is not wearing make-up. She needs make-up to try to fit in the adult world she is desperately trying to gain ground in. She's been doing this for many years now.
Now since she has to be true to Lancome her story and belief system has changed. I know she works for them and has to say those things but where is the honor in pushing something you don't believe in? Like the very few examples I've shown above maybe the real issue she has no real honor?
From socialitelife.com May 2011 “I feel lucky to embody a fragrance I am so crazy in love with,” Watson said of the eau, which adds hints of Turkish rose and cool raspberry to the fruity-floral classic. “I didn’t really like perfumes before because I thought they were heavy, but this one is really light and playful.” Watson went on to say, “Being a Lancôme ambassadress today is an immense pleasure and a great honor. For me, Lancôme is an authentic brand. It reflects elegance, class and style.”
All Emma to me is your typical celebrity going through the motions saying the right things instead of saying what she believes. It's those "right things" coupled with her good looks and fashion sense that has made her popular. It's a image based off of shallow, materialistic and far from the truth things. She's a politician without being voted in. She is no different or unique when it comes to celebrity standards but she'll tell you different like she told Mexico seventeen magazine she's like Dory the Fish. You can say she has a right to change her mind but there is way too much, "she's changed her mind" on to be able to use that excuse. You can say she is forced to say those things but I ask you why would anyone want to be forced to say things they do not believe in? That's not having a strong sense of your conviction now is it? This all throws up red flags for me stating we have more of a charlatan then the real deal. As you can tell if you read those examples above or kept up with this blog, Emma Watson is too busy trying to be a brand instead of being a person that's an actress.
If you want to believe in that and her that is your perogrative but I perfer the genuine article over a media hyped and self created fairytale. Maybe if she cut out some of the more smug I am above all that statements to only go back on them it would not be that repugnant later. I rather have an imperfect person that's an actress then a fake brand that sells out.
WHAT IS A SELL OUT? "Selling out" refers to the perception that someone is compromising their integrity, morality, or principles in exchange for money or "success." It is commonly associated with attempts to tailor material to a mainstream audience. Selling out is often seen as gaining success at the cost of credibility.
No comments:
Post a Comment